Grumman Aircraft Eng. Corp. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Grumman Aircraft Eng. Corp. v. United States

46 Cust. Ct. 677

United States Customs Court·Decided May 2, 1961·No. Reap. Dec. 9994; Entry No. 528369·Published

Opinion

Laweence, Judge:

When the above-enumerated appeal for a re-appraisement was called for hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff, and the case was ordered submitted by the court.

An examination of the official record discloses no reason for disturbing the presumptively correct value for the merchandise found by the appraiser.

I, therefore, find and hold the proper dutiable value of the merchandise covered by said appeal to be the value found by the appraiser. Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Laweence, Judge:

When the above-enumerated appeal for a re-appraisement was called for hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff, and the case was ordered submitted by the court.

An examination of the official record discloses no reason for disturbing the presumptively correct value for the merchandise found by the appraiser.

I, therefore, find and hold the proper dutiable value of the merchandise covered by said appeal to be the value found by the appraiser. Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Grumman Aircraft Eng. Corp. v. United States, 46 Cust. Ct. 677 (cusc 1961).

Pincite

46 Cust. Ct. 677 (Grumman Aircraft Eng. Corp. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.