Grullon v. North Miami Medical Center

780 So. 2d 196, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 829, 2001 WL 76859
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 31, 2001·No. No. 3D99-2493·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiffy'personal representative in a negligence and wrongful death action appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict for the defendants. We affirm.

The trial court acted within its discretion in denying the for-cause challenge of venire member Maduro. See Martinez v. Hertz Corp., 696 So.2d 1212, 1214 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)(holding that complete exchange between trial court, juror, and counsel revealed that trial court did not. abuse its discretion in denying the challenge for cause).

Although we expressly disapprove the remarks made by defense counsel concerning plaintiffs attorney, no objection was lodged below. However offensive they may have been they do not rise to the level of fundamental error. See Florida Super[197]*197markets Inc. v. White, 667 So.2d 848 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grullon v. North Miami Medical Center, 780 So. 2d 196, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 829, 2001 WL 76859 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

780 So. 2d 196 (Grullon v. North Miami Medical Center) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Whitby v. State
933 So. 2d 557 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)