Gruenewald v. 132 West 31st Street Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gruenewald v. 132 West 31st Street Realty Corp.

205 A.D.2d 498, 613 N.Y.S.2d 39, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5971

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 6, 1994

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 205 A.D.2d 498 (Gruenewald v. 132 West 31st Street Realty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gruenewald v. 132 West 31st Street Realty Corp., 205 A.D.2d 498, 613 N.Y.S.2d 39, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5971 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action for wrongful termination of employment pursuant to Labor Law § 740, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gowan, J.), entered June 29, 1992, which denied the defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment dismissing the plaintiff’s demand for punitive damages.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion is granted.

The relief enumerated in Labor Law § 740 was intended by the Legislature to be the exclusive remedies available to a plaintiff (see, Labor Law § 740 [5]). Since Labor Law § 740 (5) does not authorize recovery for punitive damages, the plaintiff’s demand for that relief should have been dismissed (see, Hoffman v Altana, Inc., 198 AD2d 210). Thompson, J. P., Rosenblatt, Ritter, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for wrongful termination of employment pursuant to Labor Law § 740, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gowan, J.), entered June 29, 1992, which denied the defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment dismissing the plaintiff’s demand for punitive damages.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion is granted.

The relief enumerated in Labor Law § 740 was intended by the Legislature to be the exclusive remedies available to a plaintiff (see, Labor Law § 740 [5]). Since Labor Law § 740 (5) does not authorize recovery for punitive damages, the plaintiff’s demand for that relief should have been dismissed (see, Hoffman v Altana, Inc., 198 AD2d 210). Thompson, J. P., Rosenblatt, Ritter, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

205 A.D.2d 498, 613 N.Y.S.2d 39, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5971, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gruenewald-v-132-west-31st-street-realty-corp-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack