Gruenewald v. 132 West 31st Street Realty Corp.

205 A.D.2d 498, 613 N.Y.S.2d 39, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5971
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 6, 1994·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

In an action for wrongful termination of employment pursuant to Labor Law § 740, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gowan, J.), entered June 29, 1992, which denied the defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment dismissing the plaintiff’s demand for punitive damages.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion is granted.

The relief enumerated in Labor Law § 740 was intended by the Legislature to be the exclusive remedies available to a plaintiff (see, Labor Law § 740 [5]). Since Labor Law § 740 (5) does not authorize recovery for punitive damages, the plaintiff’s demand for that relief should have been dismissed (see, Hoffman v Altana, Inc., 198 AD2d 210). Thompson, J. P., Rosenblatt, Ritter, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gruenewald v. 132 West 31st Street Realty Corp., 205 A.D.2d 498, 613 N.Y.S.2d 39, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5971 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

205 A.D.2d 498 (Gruenewald v. 132 West 31st Street Realty Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Copantitla v. Fiskardo Estiatorio, Inc.
788 F. Supp. 2d 253 (S.D. New York, 2011)
Clarke v. TRW, INC.
921 F. Supp. 927 (N.D. New York, 1996)
Kraus v. New Rochelle Hospital Medical Center
216 A.D.2d 360 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)