Gruendler v. Gruendler

Missouri Court of Appeals

Gruendler v. Gruendler

729 S.W.2d 530, 1987 Mo. App. LEXIS 3837

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 24, 1987·No. No. 51854·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Husband appeals from the trial court’s judgment on his motion to modify a dissolution decree. The trial court reduced rather than eliminated the maintenance award to the wife and refused to make the reduction retroactive to the date the husband’s motion was filed. Wife cross-appeals from the maintenance reduction and from the denial of attorney’s fees. We find the trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears and an extended opinion would serve no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Husband appeals from the trial court’s judgment on his motion to modify a dissolution decree. The trial court reduced rather than eliminated the maintenance award to the wife and refused to make the reduction retroactive to the date the husband’s motion was filed. Wife cross-appeals from the maintenance reduction and from the denial of attorney’s fees. We find the trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears and an extended opinion would serve no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Gruendler v. Gruendler, 729 S.W.2d 530, 1987 Mo. App. LEXIS 3837 (Mo. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

729 S.W.2d 530 (Gruendler v. Gruendler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.