Gruenbaum v. State

899 So. 2d 452, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 4652, 2005 WL 767081
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 6, 2005·No. No. 4D04-380·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Appellant’s claim that the rule of sequestration was violated is refuted by Nieves v. State, 739 So.2d 125 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999). His claim that the state committed a discovery violation is not preserved and, in any event, the violation was not prejudicial.

WARNER, GROSS and MAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gruenbaum v. State, 899 So. 2d 452, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 4652, 2005 WL 767081 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

899 So. 2d 452 (Gruenbaum v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nieves v. State
739 So. 2d 125 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)