Gruen Watch Co. v. United States

26 Cust. Ct. 329, 1951 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 100
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedJanuary 11, 1951
DocketNo. 55107; protests 127366-K and 128993-K (Cleveland)
StatusPublished

This text of 26 Cust. Ct. 329 (Gruen Watch Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gruen Watch Co. v. United States, 26 Cust. Ct. 329, 1951 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 100 (cusc 1951).

Opinion

[330]*330Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the appraisement of the merchandise and the liquidation of the entries were made in the same manner, under facts and circumstances the same in all material respects, as the appraisement and liquidation in The Gruen Watch Company v. United States (24 Cust. Ct. 101, C. D. 1216). In accordance with stipulation and following the cited authority the claim of the plaintiff was sustained. It was further held that a legal liquidation should be had which would form the basis for a protest in which, should it so desire, the importer may litigate any questions presented by such action under section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gruen Watch Co. v. United States
24 Cust. Ct. 101 (U.S. Customs Court, 1950)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 Cust. Ct. 329, 1951 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gruen-watch-co-v-united-states-cusc-1951.