Gruen Watch Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Gruen Watch Co. v. United States

26 Cust. Ct. 329, 1951 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 100

United States Customs Court·Decided January 11, 1951·No. No. 55107; protests 127366-K and 128993-K (Cleveland)·Published

Opinion

[330] Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the appraisement of the merchandise and the liquidation of the entries were made in the same manner, under facts and circumstances the same in all material respects, as the appraisement and liquidation in The Gruen Watch Company v. United States (24 Cust. Ct. 101, C. D. 1216). In accordance with stipulation and following the cited authority the claim of the plaintiff was sustained. It was further held that a legal liquidation should be had which would form the basis for a protest in which, should it so desire, the importer may litigate any questions presented by such action under section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[330] Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the appraisement of the merchandise and the liquidation of the entries were made in the same manner, under facts and circumstances the same in all material respects, as the appraisement and liquidation in The Gruen Watch Company v. United States (24 Cust. Ct. 101, C. D. 1216). In accordance with stipulation and following the cited authority the claim of the plaintiff was sustained. It was further held that a legal liquidation should be had which would form the basis for a protest in which, should it so desire, the importer may litigate any questions presented by such action under section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.

Gruen Watch Co. v. United States, 26 Cust. Ct. 329, 1951 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 100 (cusc 1951).

Pincite

26 Cust. Ct. 329 (Gruen Watch Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related