Gruelich v. Hartford

Ohio Supreme Court

Gruelich v. Hartford

788 N.E.2d 1098, 99 Ohio St. 3d 1415

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMay 16, 2003

Docket2003-0427

StatusPublished

This text of 788 N.E.2d 1098 (Gruelich v. Hartford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gruelich v. Hartford, 788 N.E.2d 1098, 99 Ohio St. 3d 1415 (Ohio 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. No. 80987, 2003-Ohio-652.

Discretionary appeal denied on Proposition of Law No. I.TL Lundberg Stratton and O’Connor, JJ., dissent, would allow Proposition of Law No. I, and would hold on this proposition of law for the decision in 2003-0302 and 2003-0362, Taylor v. Kemper Ins. Co., Cuyahoga App. No. 81360, 2003-Ohio-177.

Discretionary appeal allowed on Proposition of Law No. II and cause held for the decision in 2002-0579, Burkhart v. CNA Ins. Co., Stark App. No. 2001CA00265, 2002-0hio-903; briefing schedule stayed.

Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cuyahoga App. No. 80987, 2003-Ohio-652.

Discretionary appeal denied on Proposition of Law No. I.TL Lundberg Stratton and O’Connor, JJ., dissent, would allow Proposition of Law No. I, and would hold on this proposition of law for the decision in 2003-0302 and 2003-0362, Taylor v. Kemper Ins. Co., Cuyahoga App. No. 81360, 2003-Ohio-177.

Discretionary appeal allowed on Proposition of Law No. II and cause held for the decision in 2002-0579, Burkhart v. CNA Ins. Co., Stark App. No. 2001CA00265, 2002-0hio-903; briefing schedule stayed.

Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

788 N.E.2d 1098, 99 Ohio St. 3d 1415, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gruelich-v-hartford-ohio-2003.