Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Grudzinski v. Voyer

Grudzinski v. Voyer

654 So. 2d 675, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5413, 1995 WL 302336
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 19, 1995
DocketNo. 94-1506
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 654 So. 2d 675 (Grudzinski v. Voyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Grudzinski v. Voyer, 654 So. 2d 675, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5413, 1995 WL 302336 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Debrah Grudzinski appeals a nonfinal order denying her petition to intervene in the child custody modification proceeding involving her grandchild. We treat the notice of appeal as a petition for certiorari,1 and, finding no abuse of discretion, deny the petition. See Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.230; John G. Grubbs, Inc. v. Suncoast Excavating, Inc., 594 So.2d 346 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992) (stating that intervention is not a matter of right, but rests within the trial court’s discretion).

PETITION DENIED.

DAUKSCH, COBB and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

SUPERIOR FENCE & RAIL OF NORTH FLORIDA v. Lucas
35 So. 3d 104 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
654 So. 2d 675, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5413, 1995 WL 302336, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grudzinski-v-voyer-fladistctapp-1995.