Grublauskas v. Grublauskas

Connecticut Superior Court

Grublauskas v. Grublauskas

4 Conn. Super. Ct. 155

CourtConnecticut Superior Court

DecidedSeptember 22, 1936

DocketFile No. 49238

StatusPublished

This text of 4 Conn. Super. Ct. 155 (Grublauskas v. Grublauskas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grublauskas v. Grublauskas, 4 Conn. Super. Ct. 155 (Colo. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

The plaintiff married the defendant, who had five children by a former marriage. While the marriage never has been and probably never can be a success, there is too much to be said on both sides to justify a decree on the ground of desertion based on the bare refusal of the defendant to accompany the plaintiff to a somewhat indefinite *Page 156 home in Branford under the conditions disclosed by the evidence.

The complaint is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The plaintiff married the defendant, who had five children by a former marriage. While the marriage never has been and probably never can be a success, there is too much to be said on both sides to justify a decree on the ground of desertion based on the bare refusal of the defendant to accompany the plaintiff to a somewhat indefinite *Page 156 home in Branford under the conditions disclosed by the evidence.

The complaint is dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 Conn. Super. Ct. 155, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grublauskas-v-grublauskas-connsuperct-1936.