Grublauskas v. Grublauskas
4 Conn. Supp. 155, 1936 Conn. Super. LEXIS 132
Opinion
The plaintiff married the defendant, who had five children by a former marriage. While the marriage never has been and probably never can be a success, there is too much to be said on both sides to justify a decree on the ground of desertion based on the bare refusal of the defendant to accompany the plaintiff to a somewhat indefin[156] ite home in Branford under the conditions disclosed by the evidence.
The complaint is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Grublauskas v. Grublauskas, 4 Conn. Supp. 155, 1936 Conn. Super. LEXIS 132 (Colo. Ct. App. 1936).
4 Conn. Supp. 155 (Grublauskas v. Grublauskas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.