Gruber v. Chvatil
This text of 43 A.D.2d 563 (Gruber v. Chvatil) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated February 26, 1973, which granted plaintiff’s motion to strike the affirmative defense that plaintiff’s exclusive remedy is workmen’s compensation. Order reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements, and motion denied. In our opinion, whether the injury allegedly sustained by plaintiff is within the scope of the Workmen’s Compensation Law is a matter to be determined upon a trial. Rabin, P. J., Hopkins, Munder, Martuseello and Latham, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
43 A.D.2d 563, 349 N.Y.S.2d 323, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3210, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gruber-v-chvatil-nyappdiv-1973.