Grubbs v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Grubbs v. State

362 So. 2d 396, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16181

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 23, 1978

DocketNo. 77-853

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 362 So. 2d 396 (Grubbs v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grubbs v. State, 362 So. 2d 396, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16181 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

ANSTEAD, Judge.

The appellant is challenging a condition of his probation which requires that he consent to a search of himself or any vehicle or premises under his control, at any time, by [397]*397any law enforcement officer. We have previously held that such a condition is lawful. Isaacs v. State, 351 So.2d 359 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977); Pace v. State, 350 So.2d 1075 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977). However, we feel this question is of great public interest and accordingly the following question is hereby certified to the Supreme Court:

Is a condition of probation requiring a probationer to consent to a search at any time, by any law enforcement officer, violative of the probationer’s rights under the Fourth Amendment of the United States’ Constitution or Article I, Section 12 of the Florida Constitution?

The judgment and order of probation are affirmed.

DOWNEY, C. J., and DAUKSCH, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ANSTEAD, Judge.

The appellant is challenging a condition of his probation which requires that he consent to a search of himself or any vehicle or premises under his control, at any time, by [397]*397any law enforcement officer. We have previously held that such a condition is lawful. Isaacs v. State, 351 So.2d 359 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977); Pace v. State, 350 So.2d 1075 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977). However, we feel this question is of great public interest and accordingly the following question is hereby certified to the Supreme Court:

Is a condition of probation requiring a probationer to consent to a search at any time, by any law enforcement officer, violative of the probationer’s rights under the Fourth Amendment of the United States’ Constitution or Article I, Section 12 of the Florida Constitution?

The judgment and order of probation are affirmed.

DOWNEY, C. J., and DAUKSCH, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

362 So. 2d 396, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16181, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grubbs-v-state-fladistctapp-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack