Grubb v. . Cecil

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Grubb v. . Cecil

162 S.E. 924, 202 N.C. 826, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 246

DecidedFebruary 17, 1932

StatusPublished

This text of 162 S.E. 924 (Grubb v. . Cecil) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grubb v. . Cecil, 162 S.E. 924, 202 N.C. 826, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 246 (N.C. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Civil action tried upon the following issues:

"1. Did the plaintiffs and the defendant enter into the contract as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes.

"2. If so, did the defendant breach said contract as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes.

"3. If so, what damages, if any, are the plaintiffs entitled to recover of the defendant? Answer: $500."

From a judgment on the verdict, the defendant appeals, assigning errors. The dispute was essentially one of fact, determinable alone by the jury. A careful perusal of the record leaves us with the impression that the case has been tried substantially in accord with the decisions and principles applicable. The verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI