Grubaugh, Edith Beth v. Jose Almanza Gomez and Tesco Corporation

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 4, 2012·No. 05-11-01486-CV·Published

Opinion

Order issued: October 4 , 2012

In The (Court uf Apprats Distrirt of Texas at Dallas No. 05-11-01486-CV

EDITH GRUBAUGH, Appellant

V.

JOSE ALMANZA GOMEZ, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 09-07002

ORDER Before the Court is appellant's third motion for an extension of time to file a brief. Appellant

requests a sixty-two day extension of time to file a brief. We DENY appellant's motion. Appellant

shall file a brief within fifteen days of the date of this order. If appellant fails to file a brief within

fifteen days, the Court will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution without further notice. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 3 8.8(a)(1).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order issued: October 4 , 2012

In The (Court uf Apprats Distrirt of Texas at Dallas No. 05-11-01486-CV

EDITH GRUBAUGH, Appellant

V.

JOSE ALMANZA GOMEZ, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 09-07002

ORDER Before the Court is appellant's third motion for an extension of time to file a brief. Appellant

requests a sixty-two day extension of time to file a brief. We DENY appellant's motion. Appellant

shall file a brief within fifteen days of the date of this order. If appellant fails to file a brief within

fifteen days, the Court will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution without further notice. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 3 8.8(a)(1).

Grubaugh, Edith Beth v. Jose Almanza Gomez and Tesco Corporation, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Grubaugh, Edith Beth v. Jose Almanza Gomez and Tesco Corporation (Grubaugh, Edith Beth v. Jose Almanza Gomez and Tesco Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.