Grub v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Grub v. State

1924 OK CR 292, 230 P. 1117, 28 Okla. Crim. 285, 1924 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 310

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedNovember 25, 1924

DocketNo. A-4689.

StatusPublished

This text of 1924 OK CR 292 (Grub v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grub v. State, 1924 OK CR 292, 230 P. 1117, 28 Okla. Crim. 285, 1924 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 310 (Okla. Ct. App. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Gny Grub, was convicted on a charge that "he"did sell about one-half gallon of whisky to one Luía Valentine, and his punishment fixed at confinement for 30 days in the county jail and a fine of $100. He has appealed from the judgment rendered upon such conviction. No brief has been filed and no appearance made on behalf of appellant in this court. When called for final submission the case was submitted on motion of the Attorney General to affirm the judgment for failure to prosecute. We have examined the record, and find that there is evidence sufficient to support the judgment, and there being no apparent error warranting a reversal, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Gny Grub, was convicted on a charge that "he"did sell about one-half gallon of whisky to one Luía Valentine, and his punishment fixed at confinement for 30 days in the county jail and a fine of $100. He has appealed from the judgment rendered upon such conviction. No brief has been filed and no appearance made on behalf of appellant in this court. When called for final submission the case was submitted on motion of the Attorney General to affirm the judgment for failure to prosecute. We have examined the record, and find that there is evidence sufficient to support the judgment, and there being no apparent error warranting a reversal, the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1924 OK CR 292, 230 P. 1117, 28 Okla. Crim. 285, 1924 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 310, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grub-v-state-oklacrimapp-1924.