Growman v. Globe Apartments, Inc.

283 A.D. 1050, 131 N.Y.S.2d 498, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6266
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 21, 1954·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Order unanimously reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellants, the motion to dismiss the complaint granted and judgment is directed to be entered in favor of the appellants dismissing the complaint herein, with costs. The innuendos of the complaint seek to give the language of the letters a broader application, but improperly and ineffectually, because it is not the office of the innuendo to graft a meaning, upon or enlarge the matters set forth, but to explain the application of the words used (O’Connell [1051]*1051V. Press Pub. Co., 214 N. Y. 352, 360). The alleged defamatory matter is not actionable per se and it is not alleged that the publication caused the respondents special damage. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Bastow and Botein, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Growman v. Globe Apartments, Inc., 283 A.D. 1050, 131 N.Y.S.2d 498, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6266 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1954).

283 A.D. 1050 (Growman v. Globe Apartments, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

November v. Time Inc.
194 N.E.2d 126 (New York Court of Appeals, 1963)
Brown v. Reed
10 Misc. 2d 289 (New York Supreme Court, 1957)
Lasky v. Kempton
206 Misc. 962 (New York Supreme Court, 1954)