GROWEST, INC. v. DENELSBECK, JR., JOHN S.
Opinion
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
748 CA 12-02308 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, FAHEY, CARNI, AND LINDLEY, JJ.
GROWEST, INC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
V ORDER
JOHN S. DENELSBECK, JR., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, ET AL., DEFENDANT.
MARK WOLBER, UTICA, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
MARK CURLEY, CORPORATION COUNSEL, UTICA (LAURA R. CAMPION OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.
Appeal from an amended order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Samuel D. Hester, J.), entered October 16, 2012. The amended order, inter alia, denied the motion of defendant John S. Denelsbeck, Jr., for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
It is hereby ORDERED that the amended order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Entered: June 14, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
GROWEST, INC. v. DENELSBECK, JR., JOHN S. (GROWEST, INC. v. DENELSBECK, JR., JOHN S.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.