Grower v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad

109 A.D. 910, 95 N.Y.S. 1131

This text of 109 A.D. 910 (Grower v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Grower v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad, 109 A.D. 910, 95 N.Y.S. 1131 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except McLennan, P. J., who dissented upon the ground that the evidence presented questions of fact as to the negligence of defendant and freedom from contributory negligence of plaintiff is intestate which should have been submitted to the jury.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
109 A.D. 910, 95 N.Y.S. 1131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grower-v-new-york-central-hudson-river-railroad-nyappdiv-1905.