Growden v. State

347 So. 2d 631, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16140
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 13, 1977·No. No. 76-310·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon review and consideration of the briefs, record on appeal and oral argument we are of the opinion that no reversible error has been clearly demonstrated, and the judgment and sentence is thereby affirmed except to the extent that reference in the sentence to imprisonment “at hard labor” is improper and is accordingly deleted. See McDonald v. State, 321 So.2d 453 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975).

AFFIRMED, as modified.

MAGER, C. J., and ANSTEAD and LETTS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Growden v. State, 347 So. 2d 631, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16140 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

347 So. 2d 631 (Growden v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Growden v. State
372 So. 2d 930 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1979)
Iglesias v. State
370 So. 2d 862 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)