Grow v. Patton

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Grow v. Patton

313 S.W.2d 572

DecidedDecember 5, 1957

StatusPublished

This text of 313 S.W.2d 572 (Grow v. Patton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grow v. Patton, 313 S.W.2d 572 (Ky. Ct. App. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On a jury verdict the appellees, were awarded $1,930.67 against the appellant for breach of warranty of an automatic tier for a hay baler. We are affirming the judgment because we think the-Ohio Circuit Court had venue of the cross-petition of the appellees against the appellant and Pope Automatic Equipment Company, a foreign corporation. We think also that the evidence was sufficient to support the finding that the appellees relied' upon the warranty made by the appellant,, and further that the pleadings and the evidence supported the award of damages.

The motion for an appeal is overruled; and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

On a jury verdict the appellees, were awarded $1,930.67 against the appellant for breach of warranty of an automatic tier for a hay baler. We are affirming the judgment because we think the-Ohio Circuit Court had venue of the cross-petition of the appellees against the appellant and Pope Automatic Equipment Company, a foreign corporation. We think also that the evidence was sufficient to support the finding that the appellees relied' upon the warranty made by the appellant,, and further that the pleadings and the evidence supported the award of damages.

The motion for an appeal is overruled; and the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

313 S.W.2d 572, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grow-v-patton-kyctapp-1957.