Grow v. Dobbins
124 Mass. 560, 1878 Mass. LEXIS 375
Opinion
The plaintiff did not allege or prove that the estate of the intestate had been settled when his right of action accrued. If it had not, the plaintiff had a remedy under the Gen. Sts. c. 97, §§ 8, 9, by application to the Probate Court and action against the administratrix, and therefore, by the express terms of e. 101, § 31, cannot maintain this action against the heirs. Hall v. Bumstead, 20 Pick. 2.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Grow v. Dobbins, 124 Mass. 560, 1878 Mass. LEXIS 375 (Mass. 1878).
124 Mass. 560 (Grow v. Dobbins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cantor v. Newton
358 N.E.2d 247 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1976)
Libby v. Hutchinson
55 A. 547 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1903)
Forbes v. Harrington
50 N.E. 641 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1898)
Clark v. Holbrook
146 Mass. 366 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1888)
Bassett v. Granger
136 Mass. 174 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1883)
Hammond v. Granger
128 Mass. 272 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1880)
Ames v. Ames
128 Mass. 277 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1880)
Grow v. Dobbins
128 Mass. 271 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1880)
Brooks v. Rayner
127 Mass. 268 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1879)