Grow v. Dobbins

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Grow v. Dobbins

124 Mass. 560, 1878 Mass. LEXIS 375

CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

DecidedJune 28, 1878

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 124 Mass. 560 (Grow v. Dobbins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grow v. Dobbins, 124 Mass. 560, 1878 Mass. LEXIS 375 (Mass. 1878).

Pincite

Opinion

Gray, C. J.

The plaintiff did not allege or prove that the estate of the intestate had been settled when his right of action accrued. If it had not, the plaintiff had a remedy under the Gen. Sts. c. 97, §§ 8, 9, by application to the Probate Court and action against the administratrix, and therefore, by the express terms of e. 101, § 31, cannot maintain this action against the heirs. Hall v. Bumstead, 20 Pick. 2.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gray, C. J.

The plaintiff did not allege or prove that the estate of the intestate had been settled when his right of action accrued. If it had not, the plaintiff had a remedy under the Gen. Sts. c. 97, §§ 8, 9, by application to the Probate Court and action against the administratrix, and therefore, by the express terms of e. 101, § 31, cannot maintain this action against the heirs. Hall v. Bumstead, 20 Pick. 2.

Exceptions overruled.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

124 Mass. 560, 1878 Mass. LEXIS 375, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grow-v-dobbins-mass-1878.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack