Grow v. Buffalo, Rochester & Pittsburg Railway Co.

52 A. 1134, 203 Pa. 249, 1902 Pa. LEXIS 698
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJune 4, 1902
DocketAppeal, No. 106
StatusPublished

This text of 52 A. 1134 (Grow v. Buffalo, Rochester & Pittsburg Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Grow v. Buffalo, Rochester & Pittsburg Railway Co., 52 A. 1134, 203 Pa. 249, 1902 Pa. LEXIS 698 (Pa. 1902).

Opinion

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Mestrezat,

The reasons assigned in the application for a change of venue in this case are the same as those in Willoughby et al. v. Buffalo, Rochester & Pittsburg Railroad Company, in which an opinion has this day been filed. The same learned judge heard both applications and refused them for the same reasons. We are, therefore, compelled to reverse the order of the court below, and remand the case for a rehearing of the application in accordance with the views expressed in the opinion filed in the Willoughby case.

Order reversed with a procedendo.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
52 A. 1134, 203 Pa. 249, 1902 Pa. LEXIS 698, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grow-v-buffalo-rochester-pittsburg-railway-co-pa-1902.