Groves v. Richmond

5 N.W. 763, 53 Iowa 570
CourtSupreme Court of Iowa
DecidedApril 27, 1880
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 5 N.W. 763 (Groves v. Richmond) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Groves v. Richmond, 5 N.W. 763, 53 Iowa 570 (iowa 1880).

Opinion

Rotiirock, J.

1 Scfcourt: certioran. In Keniston v. Hewitt, 48 Iowa, 679, it was determined that the District Court has no jurisdiction in certiorari in civil cases, and that such jurisdicUon is exclusive in the Circuit Court. The decisjon jn that case had not been published when this cause was determined in the court below, and jurisdiction was entertained without objection, and no objection is made in this court.

2. appeal. "We have held in all cases where it appears that there is a want of jurisdiction in the court below, or where the ruling made is in excess of the authority or j>ower of the court, that it is the duty of .this court to recognize such want of jurisdiction, even if no objection be made. See St. Joseph Manufacturing Company v. Harrington, ante, 380.

It has come to our knowledge since the submission of the cause that the venue of the action has been changed to the Circuit Court, and we have been requested.to determine the question on the merits; but, for the sake of uniformity in the practice in this court, we think it better to require that the case come to us upon an appeal from a tribunal having jurisdiction of the subject matter. The appeal will be

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Johnson v. Purcell
282 N.W. 741 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1938)
Chicago, B. Q.R. Co. v. Board
221 N.W. 223 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1928)
Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Board of Supervisors
206 Iowa 487 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1928)
Latta v. Utterback
211 N.W. 503 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1926)
Fort Dodge Lumber Co. v. Rogosch
175 Iowa 475 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1916)
Belknap v. Belknap
134 N.W. 734 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1912)
State ex inf. Hadley v. Standard Oil Co.
116 S.W. 902 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1909)
Schaller & Son v. Marker
114 N.W. 43 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1907)
Yockey v. Woodbury County
106 N.W. 950 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1906)
State ex rel. Milwaukee Medical College v. Chittenden
107 N.W. 500 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1906)
Porter v. Welsh
90 N.W. 582 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1902)
McLachlan v. Incorporated Town of Gray
74 N.W. 773 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1898)
State v. Belvel
27 L.R.A. 846 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1893)
State ex rel. Perine v. Van Beek
87 Iowa 569 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1893)
Groves v. Richmond
56 Iowa 69 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1881)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 N.W. 763, 53 Iowa 570, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/groves-v-richmond-iowa-1880.