Grover v. Bruce
This text of 10 Ind. 418 (Grover v. Bruce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Suit upon notes payable to E. M. Bruce [419]*419& Co. The complaint is by Eli M. Bruce and Henry Bruce, jun., and alleges the notes were payable to them. Copies of the notes were set out in the complaint. A demurrer to the complaint was overruled. The notes were admitted in evidence under it. Thus far there was no error. The Warden, &c., of St. James’s Church v. Moore et al., 1 Ind. R. 289.-Louden v. Walpole, id. 319.—Muirhead v. Snyder, 4 id. 486. See Abernathy v. Reeves et al., 7 id. 306.
It is contended that the evidence did not sustain the judgment; but the record does not purport to contain all the evidence, and the case is, therefore, not before us on the merits.
The judgment is affirmed, with 3 per cent, damages and costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
10 Ind. 418, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grover-v-bruce-ind-1858.