Grover v. Bd. of Ed., Franklin Twp.

144 A. 918, 104 N.J. Eq. 197, 1929 N.J. LEXIS 500
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 4, 1929·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Buchanan, and reported in 102 N. J. Eq. 415.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Teenchaed, Pakkee, Kalisch, Lloyd, White, McGlennon, Deae, JJ. 8.

For reversal — Katzenbach, Campbell, Van Buskiek, Hetfield, JJ. 4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grover v. Bd. of Ed., Franklin Twp., 144 A. 918, 104 N.J. Eq. 197, 1929 N.J. LEXIS 500 (N.J. 1929).

144 A. 918 (Grover v. Bd. of Ed., Franklin Twp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Borough of Totowa v. American Surety Co. of New York
188 A.2d 586 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1963)
GUARANTEE CO. OF NO. AMER. v. Tandy & Allen Constr. Co.
184 A.2d 426 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1962)
Verdi v. Jefferson Trust Co.
198 A. 543 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1938)
Fidelity v. McClintic-marshall Corp
171 A. 382 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1934)
Stulz-Sickles Co. v. Fredburn Constr. Corp.
169 A. 27 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1933)