Grovenstein v. Brewer

1 Ga. L. Rep. 367
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided July 1, 1886·Published

Opinion

Hall, J.

Where suit was brought on an instrument under seal which bound the defendant in a certain manner and a certain time to pay the plaintiff for certain timber, and pending the cause the plaintiff died and his executor was made a party; and where, on the trial the instrument sued on was tendered in evidence, together with an account of the timber cut and the amount due therefor and a receipt written thereon for “payment in full up to date, including a note given on twenty days’ time” and signed by the decedent, and also a note for the amount shown to be due by the account;'and where it was shown that the account and receipt except the signature was in the handwriting of the defendant, and that the note bore his signature:

Held that the note was admissible in evidence to show that the amount for which it was given had not been paid-

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grovenstein v. Brewer, 1 Ga. L. Rep. 367 (Ga. 1886).

1 Ga. L. Rep. 367 (Grovenstein v. Brewer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.