Grovenburgh v. McKeough

76 N.W. 77, 117 Mich. 555, 1898 Mich. LEXIS 907
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided July 12, 1898·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Grant, C. J.

(after stating the facts). Counsel for complainant insist that the case is ruled by Randall v. Chubb, 46 Mich. 311 (41 Am. Rep. 165), and Lewis v. Sheldon, 103 Mich. 102. The contention cannot be sustained. In those two cases the leases had been assigned, and the assignors had parted with all control. Complainant has not been injured: He contracted for the personal obligation of defendant, who, he now admits, stands in the shoes of the original lessee. He has that obligation still unimpaired. The abandoned oral contract did not operate as a forfeiture of the lease.

Judgment affirmed.

The other Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grovenburgh v. McKeough, 76 N.W. 77, 117 Mich. 555, 1898 Mich. LEXIS 907 (Mich. 1898).

76 N.W. 77 (Grovenburgh v. McKeough) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McDonald v. Andrews
165 N.W. 797 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1917)