Grove v. Gardiner

76 A. 178, 30 R.I. 477, 1910 R.I. LEXIS 46
CourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island
DecidedJune 9, 1910
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 76 A. 178 (Grove v. Gardiner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Grove v. Gardiner, 76 A. 178, 30 R.I. 477, 1910 R.I. LEXIS 46 (R.I. 1910).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Irregularities and defects in the replevin writ and bond, to which the defendant might have called the attention of the court by suitable objection seasonably made, have been waived by his proceeding to trial on the merits of the case, without objection. See Kimball Company v. Tasca, 26 R. I. 565.

The plaintiff's exceptions are without merit.

The issues of fact raised by the pleadings were properly submitted to the jury with suitable instructions by the judge-of the Superior Court who presided at the trial, and the verdict of the jury has been approved by him. In these circumstances *478 the case is governed by that of Wilcox v. Rhode Island Company, 29 R. I. 292.

James F. Murphy, for plaintiff. Page & Cushing, for defendant.

The plaintiff’s exceptions are therefore overruled, and the case is remitted to the Superior Court with direction to enter judgment on the verdict.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Miller Service Inc. v. Miller
45 S.E.2d 466 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1947)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
76 A. 178, 30 R.I. 477, 1910 R.I. LEXIS 46, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grove-v-gardiner-ri-1910.