Grove v. Gardiner

76 A. 178, 30 R.I. 477, 1910 R.I. LEXIS 46
Supreme Court of Rhode Island·Decided June 9, 1910·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Irregularities and defects in the replevin writ and bond, to which the defendant might have called the attention of the court by suitable objection seasonably made, have been waived by his proceeding to trial on the merits of the case, without objection. See Kimball Company v. Tasca, 26 R. I. 565.

The plaintiff's exceptions are without merit.

The issues of fact raised by the pleadings were properly submitted to the jury with suitable instructions by the judge-of the Superior Court who presided at the trial, and the verdict of the jury has been approved by him. In these circumstances *478 the case is governed by that of Wilcox v. Rhode Island Company, 29 R. I. 292.

James F. Murphy, for plaintiff. Page & Cushing, for defendant.

The plaintiff’s exceptions are therefore overruled, and the case is remitted to the Superior Court with direction to enter judgment on the verdict.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grove v. Gardiner, 76 A. 178, 30 R.I. 477, 1910 R.I. LEXIS 46 (R.I. 1910).

76 A. 178 (Grove v. Gardiner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Miller Service Inc. v. Miller
45 S.E.2d 466 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1947)