Grove v. Cornell University
This text of 957 N.E.2d 1137 (Grove v. Cornell University) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The judgment appealed from and the order of the Appellate Division brought up for review should be modified, without costs, by denying defendants’ motion for summary judgment seeking dismissal of plaintiffs Labor Law § 240 (1) claim and, as so modified, affirmed.
*877 Triable issues of fact exist as to whether defendants failed to provide an adequate safety device to plaintiff in violation of Labor Law § 240 (1) or whether plaintiffs conduct was the sole proximate cause of his injuries.
Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur in memorandum.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), judgment appealed from and order of the Appellate Division brought up for review modified, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
957 N.E.2d 1137, 17 N.Y.3d 875, 933 N.Y.S.2d 635, 2011 NY Slip Op 7258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grove-v-cornell-university-ny-2011.