Grove Press, Inc. v. Flask

Supreme Court

Grove Press, Inc. v. Flask

413 U.S. 902, 93 S. Ct. 3026

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedJune 25, 1973

DocketNo. 70-1

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 413 U.S. 902 (Grove Press, Inc. v. Flask) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grove Press, Inc. v. Flask, 413 U.S. 902, 93 S. Ct. 3026 (1973).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from D. C. N. D. Ohio. Judgment vacated and [903]*903case remanded for further consideration in light of Miller v. California, ante, p. 15; Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, ante, p. 49; Kaplan v. California, ante, p. 115; United States v. 12 200-ft. Reels Film, ante, p. 123; United States v. Orito, ante, p. 139; Heller v. New York, ante, p. 483; Roaden v. Kentucky, ante, p. 496; and Alexander v. Virginia, ante, p. 836.

Mr. Justice Brennan, joined by Mr. Justice Stewart and Mr. Justice Marshall, would vacate the judgment and remand case for further proceedings not inconsistent with his dissent in Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, ante, p. 73. See Miller v. California, ante, p. 47. Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from D. C. N. D. Ohio. Judgment vacated and [903]*903case remanded for further consideration in light of Miller v. California, ante, p. 15; Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, ante, p. 49; Kaplan v. California, ante, p. 115; United States v. 12 200-ft. Reels Film, ante, p. 123; United States v. Orito, ante, p. 139; Heller v. New York, ante, p. 483; Roaden v. Kentucky, ante, p. 496; and Alexander v. Virginia, ante, p. 836.

Mr. Justice Brennan, joined by Mr. Justice Stewart and Mr. Justice Marshall, would vacate the judgment and remand case for further proceedings not inconsistent with his dissent in Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, ante, p. 73. See Miller v. California, ante, p. 47. Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this appeal.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

413 U.S. 902, 93 S. Ct. 3026, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grove-press-inc-v-flask-scotus-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack