Grove Laboratories, Inc. v. Brewer & Co.

First Circuit

Grove Laboratories, Inc. v. Brewer & Co.

111 F.2d 124, 45 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 241, 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 3588

CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit

DecidedApril 16, 1940

DocketNo. 3569

StatusPublished

This text of 111 F.2d 124 (Grove Laboratories, Inc. v. Brewer & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grove Laboratories, Inc. v. Brewer & Co., 111 F.2d 124, 45 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 241, 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 3588 (1st Cir. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a final decree for the plaintiff because that decree does not give all the plaintiff wants. The decree was entered pursuant to and for all practical purposes in the precise words of an apparently complete and explicit mandate of this court. The mandate purported to leave nothing to the discretion of the District Judge, who was right in ordering the directed decree. If the plaintiff under the circumstances presented had felt that the mandate should have contained more by way of injunctive relief or otherwise, it could have applied seasonably to this court for its modification. No error inheres in the decree entered in the District Court.

The decree of the District Court is affirmed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a final decree for the plaintiff because that decree does not give all the plaintiff wants. The decree was entered pursuant to and for all practical purposes in the precise words of an apparently complete and explicit mandate of this court. The mandate purported to leave nothing to the discretion of the District Judge, who was right in ordering the directed decree. If the plaintiff under the circumstances presented had felt that the mandate should have contained more by way of injunctive relief or otherwise, it could have applied seasonably to this court for its modification. No error inheres in the decree entered in the District Court.

The decree of the District Court is affirmed with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

111 F.2d 124, 45 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 241, 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 3588, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grove-laboratories-inc-v-brewer-co-ca1-1940.