Grove Equity v. Commissioner

1994 T.C. Memo. 102, 67 T.C.M. 2381, 1994 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 102
CourtUnited States Tax Court
DecidedMarch 14, 1994
DocketDocket No. 3761-92
StatusUnpublished

This text of 1994 T.C. Memo. 102 (Grove Equity v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Grove Equity v. Commissioner, 1994 T.C. Memo. 102, 67 T.C.M. 2381, 1994 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 102 (tax 1994).

Opinion

GROVE EQUITY INC., Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
Grove Equity v. Commissioner
Docket No. 3761-92
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 1994-102; 1994 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 102; 67 T.C.M. (CCH) 2381;
March 14, 1994, Filed

*102 Decision will be entered for respondent.

For petitioner: Herman J. Soloway.
For respondent: Joseph F. Long.
TANNENWALD

TANNENWALD

MEMORANDUM OPINION

TANNENWALD, Judge: Respondent determined a deficiency of $ 1,493,182 in petitioner's Federal income tax for the taxable year 1981. The issue before us is whether the portion of a 1984 consolidated net operating loss (NOL) attributable to petitioner's wholly owned subsidiary, Grove Overseas Corporation (Overseas), may be carried back to petitioner's 1981 year with respect to which petitioner filed a separate return.

All of the facts were stipulated and are so found. The stipulation and exhibits attached thereto are incorporated herein by this reference.

Petitioner had its principal place of business in Greenwich, Connecticut, at the time it filed the petition herein. Petitioner filed its 1981 return with the Internal Revenue Service Center, Memphis, Tennessee. From 1982 through 1988, petitioner and Overseas filed consolidated returns.

Overseas was incorporated in 1950. In December 1981, petitioner acquired all of the stock of Overseas for $ 15,000. At that time, Overseas was dormant.

As of January 1, 1982, petitioner transferred*103 all of its operating assets and liabilities to Overseas.

An additional 100 shares of Overseas were issued to petitioner on January 14, 1982, for $ 50,000.

For 1984, the consolidated return of petitioner and Overseas reported a net operating loss of $ 3,252,900, all but $ 10,686 of which was attributable to Overseas.

The issue before us is whether petitioner can carry back the portion of the 1984 consolidated net operating loss attributable to Overseas to its preconsolidated 1981 tax year.

Petitioner argues that the transactions involved herein constituted a reorganization under either section 368(a)(1)(C) 1 (acquisition of substantially all of petitioner's assets in exchange for the stock of Overseas) or section 368(a)(1)(F) (Overseas constituted a mere change in identity or form of petitioner) and that Overseas' 1984 loss may thus be carried back under section 381. Respondent counters with the argument that the transactions in question do not constitute a (C) or (F) reorganization and section 381 therefore is inapplicable. Respondent further argues that, in any event, the amount of the 1984 consolidated NOL attributable to Overseas may not be carried back to petitioner's 1981*104 separate return year because Overseas was in existence in 1981 and did not become a member of the affiliated group immediately after its organization as specifically required by section 1.1502-79(a)(2), Income Tax Regs.2 For the reasons hereinafter set forth, we hold for respondent.

*105 We first direct our attention to the manner in which section 381 relates to the consolidated return provisions (section 1501 et seq.) and the regulations thereunder. It has long been established that, by filing a consolidated return, the members of the consolidated return group consent to the consolidated return regulations and that, short of an attack on their validity, they are bound by those regulations. Wolter Construction Co. v. Commissioner, 634 F.2d 1029, 1031 n.1 (6th Cir. 1980), affg. 68 T.C. 39 (1977); Craigie Inc. v. Commissioner, 84 T.C. 466, 471 (1985); First Natl. Bank in Little Rock v. Commissioner, 83 T.C. 202, 217 (1984). It is also well settled that the consolidated return regulations are unique and preempt other provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. Wolter Construction Co. v. Commissioner, 634 F.2d at 1044 (specifically subordinating the provisions of section 381 to the consolidated return regulations); Covil Insulation Co. v. Commissioner

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Covil Insulation Co. v. Commissioner
65 T.C. 364 (U.S. Tax Court, 1975)
Wolter Constr. Co. v. Commissioner
68 T.C. 39 (U.S. Tax Court, 1977)
Electronic Sensing Products, Inc. v. Commissioner
69 T.C. 276 (U.S. Tax Court, 1977)
Bercy Industries, Inc. v. Commissioner
70 T.C. 29 (U.S. Tax Court, 1978)
Insilco Corp. v. Commissioner
73 T.C. 589 (U.S. Tax Court, 1979)
Jim Burch & Associates, Inc. v. Commissioner
76 T.C. 202 (U.S. Tax Court, 1981)
First Nat'l Bank v. Commissioner
83 T.C. No. 13 (U.S. Tax Court, 1984)
Craigie, Inc. v. Commissioner
84 T.C. No. 34 (U.S. Tax Court, 1985)
J. A. Tobin Constr. Co. v. Commissioner
85 T.C. No. 58 (U.S. Tax Court, 1985)
Sooner Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. United States
4 Cl. Ct. 746 (Court of Claims, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1994 T.C. Memo. 102, 67 T.C.M. 2381, 1994 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grove-equity-v-commissioner-tax-1994.