Grout v. Chamberlin
This text of 4 Mass. 613 (Grout v. Chamberlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We are of opinion that the plea is bad, because a judgment recovered by an executor cannot be executed by the adminis trator de bonis non cum testamento annexa, but is become ineffectual, and the second administrator may maintain a new action.
[538]*538For the authorities in this case, we refer to the opinion of the Court in the case of Grout vs. Chamberlin, in Error; the two cn»es resting for decision on the same principles,
[Vide note to Grout vs. Chamberlin, ante. Ed.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 Mass. 613, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grout-v-chamberlin-mass-1808.