Groth Air Service, Inc. v. Florida Freight Terminal, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Groth Air Service, Inc. v. Florida Freight Terminal, Inc.

489 So. 2d 785, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1126, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7793

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 13, 1986

DocketNo. 85-1148

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 489 So. 2d 785 (Groth Air Service, Inc. v. Florida Freight Terminal, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Groth Air Service, Inc. v. Florida Freight Terminal, Inc., 489 So. 2d 785, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1126, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7793 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellants seek reversal of an adverse final judgment entered pursuant to a jury verdict in an action charging appellee Dade Facilities¹ with negligently loading a cargo airplane, resulting in damage to the airplane and loss to the appellants.

On appeal it is contended that (1) the jury’s verdict was not supported by competent substantial evidence and was against the manifest weight of the evidence, consequently, the trial court erred in denying the motion for new trial; and (2) the trial court erred in denying the motion for order permitting appellants to interview the jurors.

Upon careful consideration of appellants’ contentions in the light of the record, briefs and arguments of counsel, we have concluded that no reversible error has been demonstrated. See Dover Corp. v. Dean, 473 So.2d 710 (Fla. 4th DCA), review denied, 475 So.2d 693 (Fla.1985); Schofield v. Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc., 461 So.2d 152 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984), cert. denied, 472 So.2d 1182 (Fla.1985); Cummings v. Sine, 404 So.2d 147 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981); Thompson v. Jacobs, 314 So.2d 797 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975); Vanzant v. Davies, 215 So.2d 504 (Fla. 1st DCA 1968), cert. denied, 225 So.2d 529 (Fla.1969).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellants seek reversal of an adverse final judgment entered pursuant to a jury verdict in an action charging appellee Dade Facilities¹ with negligently loading a cargo airplane, resulting in damage to the airplane and loss to the appellants.

On appeal it is contended that (1) the jury’s verdict was not supported by competent substantial evidence and was against the manifest weight of the evidence, consequently, the trial court erred in denying the motion for new trial; and (2) the trial court erred in denying the motion for order permitting appellants to interview the jurors.

Upon careful consideration of appellants’ contentions in the light of the record, briefs and arguments of counsel, we have concluded that no reversible error has been demonstrated. See Dover Corp. v. Dean, 473 So.2d 710 (Fla. 4th DCA), review denied, 475 So.2d 693 (Fla.1985); Schofield v. Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc., 461 So.2d 152 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984), cert. denied, 472 So.2d 1182 (Fla.1985); Cummings v. Sine, 404 So.2d 147 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981); Thompson v. Jacobs, 314 So.2d 797 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975); Vanzant v. Davies, 215 So.2d 504 (Fla. 1st DCA 1968), cert. denied, 225 So.2d 529 (Fla.1969).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

489 So. 2d 785, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1126, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7793, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/groth-air-service-inc-v-florida-freight-terminal-inc-fladistctapp-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack