Grote v. Metalcraft Enterprises, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Grote v. Metalcraft Enterprises, Inc.

877 S.W.2d 717, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1011, 1994 WL 270461

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 21, 1994·No. No. 65154·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Claimant appeals the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s (Commission) denial of her claim for medical expenses and temporary total disability benefits. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the Commission are supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.-16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Claimant appeals the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s (Commission) denial of her claim for medical expenses and temporary total disability benefits. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the Commission are supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.-16(b).

Grote v. Metalcraft Enterprises, Inc., 877 S.W.2d 717, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1011, 1994 WL 270461 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

877 S.W.2d 717 (Grote v. Metalcraft Enterprises, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.