Grote v. McBride

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Grote v. McBride

263 A.D. 886, 32 N.Y.S.2d 798, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7213

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 19, 1942·Published

Opinion

Order denying appellants’ motion for examination of respondent Walter Jones before trial, with leave to renew upon paying ten dollars costs, reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, without costs, the examination to proceed at a time and place to be fixed in the order to be entered hereon. In our opinion the testimony sought to be adduced is material and necessary in the prosecution of the action. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close JJ., concur. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying appellants’ motion for examination of respondent Walter Jones before trial, with leave to renew upon paying ten dollars costs, reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, without costs, the examination to proceed at a time and place to be fixed in the order to be entered hereon. In our opinion the testimony sought to be adduced is material and necessary in the prosecution of the action. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close JJ., concur. Settle order on notice.

Grote v. McBride, 263 A.D. 886, 32 N.Y.S.2d 798, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7213 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

263 A.D. 886 (Grote v. McBride) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.