Grote v. McBride
This text of 263 A.D. 886 (Grote v. McBride) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order denying appellants’ motion for examination of respondent Walter Jones before trial, with leave to renew upon paying ten dollars costs, reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, without costs, the examination to proceed at a time and place to be fixed in the order to be entered hereon. In our opinion the testimony sought to be adduced is material and necessary in the prosecution of the action. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close JJ., concur. Settle order on notice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
263 A.D. 886, 32 N.Y.S.2d 798, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grote-v-mcbride-nyappdiv-1942.