Grote v. . Grote
86 N.E. 1124, 193 N.Y. 618, 1908 N.Y. LEXIS 723
This text of 86 N.E. 1124 (Grote v. . Grote) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Grote v. . Grote, 86 N.E. 1124, 193 N.Y. 618, 1908 N.Y. LEXIS 723 (N.Y. 1908).
Opinion
The following question was certified : “ Is the defense in the answer, that plaintiff had a full, adequate and complete remedy at law, sufficient in law upon the face thereof % ”
Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the negative; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Werner, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
86 N.E. 1124, 193 N.Y. 618, 1908 N.Y. LEXIS 723, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grote-v-grote-ny-1908.