Grosz v. State
This text of 381 So. 2d 316 (Grosz v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed. There is competent substantial evidence to support the conviction of appellant for violation of the zoning ordinance which makes no provisions for the operation/maintenance of a church or synagogue in an RS-4 District; that is, a neighborhood that consists of single-family detached dwelling units. See Town v. State, 377 So.2d 648 (Fla.1979); Pylant v. Orange County, 328 So.2d 199 (Fla.1976); Smith v. City of Miami Beach, 213 So.2d 281 (Fla.3d DCA 1968), cert. discharged, 220 So.2d 624 (Fla.1969); City of Miami Beach v. Greater Miami Hebrew Academy, 108 So.2d 50 (Fla.3d DCA 1959), cert. denied, 113 So.2d 229 (Fla.1959); Miami Beach United Lutheran Church of the Epiphany v. City of Miami Beach, 82 So.2d 880 (Fla.1955); Sections 6-1A, 6-1B 1 and 14-1(d) of the City of Miami Beach Zoning Ordinance No. 1891.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
381 So. 2d 316, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 7736, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grosz-v-state-fladistctapp-1980.