Grosvenor v. Allen

Saratoga Chancery Court

Grosvenor v. Allen

1 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 25

DecidedMarch 16, 1841

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 25 (Grosvenor v. Allen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Saratoga Chancery Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grosvenor v. Allen, 1 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 25 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1841).

Pincite

Opinion

The court decided in this case that under the provisions of the Revised Statutes (1 Rev. Stat. 736, § 4), a judgment at law is not an equitable lien upon the interest of the judgment debtor in lands, under an executory contract to purchase the same; whether such lands have or have not been fully paid for, so as to entitle the vendee to an immediate conveyance to the legal estate. Order appealed from affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The court decided in this case that under the provisions of the Revised Statutes (1 Rev. Stat. 736, § 4), a judgment at law is not an equitable lien upon the interest of the judgment debtor in lands, under an executory contract to purchase the same; whether such lands have or have not been fully paid for, so as to entitle the vendee to an immediate conveyance to the legal estate. Order appealed from affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 25, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grosvenor-v-allen-nychanctsara-1841.