Grosvenor Park, Inc. v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Grosvenor Park, Inc. v. State

4 A.D.2d 989, 167 N.Y.S.2d 630, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3935

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1957

DocketClaim No. 32781

StatusPublished

This text of 4 A.D.2d 989 (Grosvenor Park, Inc. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grosvenor Park, Inc. v. State, 4 A.D.2d 989, 167 N.Y.S.2d 630, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3935 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal from a judgment of the Court of Claims awarding $182,000, with interest, for the permanent appropriation of a parcel of the claimant’s real estate. The claimant had acquired the land for the purpose of a residential development; a development map had been approved by the Nassau County Planning Commission. The Court of Claims allowed $10,320 per acre or $3,360 per building lot. There was the usual disparity between the testimony of the claimant’s expert and that of the State’s expert as to the value of the land appropriated. The Court of Claims chose a figure approximately midway between the figures given by the two experts. We see no reason to disturb the judgment of the Court of Claims. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Foster, P. J., Bergan, Coon, Halpern and Gibson, JJ..

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal from a judgment of the Court of Claims awarding $182,000, with interest, for the permanent appropriation of a parcel of the claimant’s real estate. The claimant had acquired the land for the purpose of a residential development; a development map had been approved by the Nassau County Planning Commission. The Court of Claims allowed $10,320 per acre or $3,360 per building lot. There was the usual disparity between the testimony of the claimant’s expert and that of the State’s expert as to the value of the land appropriated. The Court of Claims chose a figure approximately midway between the figures given by the two experts. We see no reason to disturb the judgment of the Court of Claims. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Foster, P. J., Bergan, Coon, Halpern and Gibson, JJ..

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 A.D.2d 989, 167 N.Y.S.2d 630, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3935, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grosvenor-park-inc-v-state-nyappdiv-1957.