Grosso v. Washington County Assessor, Tc-Md 090021b (or.tax 6-4-2009)
This text of Grosso v. Washington County Assessor, Tc-Md 090021b (or.tax 6-4-2009) (Grosso v. Washington County Assessor, Tc-Md 090021b (or.tax 6-4-2009)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Because the return was not submitted before August 1, the county assessed a penalty of 50 percent. Plaintiff was given notice of those fees by way of an omitted property notice dated December 16, 2008. The amount at issue is $3,542.14. Plaintiff requests the penalty be reduced to 15 percent. *Page 2
Plaintiff's representative stated the company was unaware of the tax and that it should have been earlier informed by Defendant or some other organization. In its Complaint, Plaintiff's owner wrote to the court:
"We did not receive the notice timely so timely filing was not possible due to the current circumstances. * * * This was our first time filing with your county."
(Ptf's Compl at 1.)
ORS
"After August 1, a taxpayer who files a return to which this section applies or who fails to file a return shall be subject to a penalty equal to 50 percent of the tax attributable to the taxable personal property of the taxpayer."
Plaintiff admittedly did not file its return before August 1, 2008. Pursuant to the statute, it is responsible for a 50 percent penalty. Plaintiff claims, however, it should be excused from the penalty because of circumstances beyond its immediate control.
ORS
ORS
"`Good and sufficient cause':
"(A) Means an extraordinary circumstance that is beyond the control of the taxpayer, or the taxpayer's agent or representative, and that causes the taxpayer, agent or representative to fail to pursue the statutory right of appeal; and
"(B) Does not include inadvertence, oversight, lack of knowledge, hardship or reliance on misleading information provided by any person except an authorized tax official providing the relevant misleading information."
The sole reason offered for the failure to file is lack of knowledge of the legal requirements. That specifically does not constitute a valid reason to compromise the statutory penalty. Nor does the failure to receive a personal property form relieve an owner of the obligation to submit an annual inventory listing.
IT IS THE DECISION OF THIS COURT that the appeal is denied.
Dated this _____ day of June 2009.
If you want to appeal this Decision, file a Complaint in the RegularDivision of the Oregon Tax Court, by mailing to: 1163 State Street,Salem, OR 97301-2563; or by hand delivery to: Fourth Floor, 1241 StateStreet, Salem, OR. Your Complaint must be submitted within 60 days after the date of theDecision or this Decision becomes final and cannot be changed. This document was signed by Magistrate Jeffrey S. Mattson on June 4,2009. The Court filed and entered this document on June 4, 2009.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Grosso v. Washington County Assessor, Tc-Md 090021b (or.tax 6-4-2009), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grosso-v-washington-county-assessor-tc-md-090021b-ortax-6-4-2009-ortc-2009.