Grosso v. Ohlig

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Grosso v. Ohlig

68 A.D.2d 933

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 19, 1979

StatusPublished

This text of 68 A.D.2d 933 (Grosso v. Ohlig) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grosso v. Ohlig, 68 A.D.2d 933 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., plaintiff appeals, on the ground of inadequacy, from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered June 14, 1977, which, upon a jury verdict, is in his favor, in the amount of $1,000. Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial granted with respect to the issue of damages only, with costs to abide the event, unless within 20 days after entry of the order to be made hereon, defendant shall serve and file in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to increase the verdict in favor of plaintiff to $2,500 and to the entry of an amended judgment accordingly, in which event the judgment, as so increased and amended, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The amount of the verdict was inadequate to the extent indicated herein. Damiani, J. P., O’Connor, Lazer and Gulotta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., plaintiff appeals, on the ground of inadequacy, from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered June 14, 1977, which, upon a jury verdict, is in his favor, in the amount of $1,000. Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial granted with respect to the issue of damages only, with costs to abide the event, unless within 20 days after entry of the order to be made hereon, defendant shall serve and file in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to increase the verdict in favor of plaintiff to $2,500 and to the entry of an amended judgment accordingly, in which event the judgment, as so increased and amended, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The amount of the verdict was inadequate to the extent indicated herein. Damiani, J. P., O’Connor, Lazer and Gulotta, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

68 A.D.2d 933, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grosso-v-ohlig-nyappdiv-1979.