Grosso v. Hults

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Grosso v. Hults

10 A.D.2d 894, 199 N.Y.S.2d 1008, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10757

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 7, 1960

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 10 A.D.2d 894 (Grosso v. Hults) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grosso v. Hults, 10 A.D.2d 894, 199 N.Y.S.2d 1008, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10757 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

t. Order unanimously reversed and proceeding dismissed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Memorandum: Special Term directed the Commissioner of Motor Vehicles to hold a hearing on petitioner’s application for reinstatement of his driver’s license. The court was without power to so direct (Matter of Muscarella v. Macduff, 281 App. Div. 565). The other question presented, that is, whether the Commissioner had authority to deny petitioner the right to reapply before April 1, 1960, we do not reach. Although this appeal has been processed promptly by the parties and by this court, this question has now become academic 'by lapse of time. (Appeal from order of Onondaga Special Term granting petitioner’s application, vacating the denial of his application for driver’s license, and making other directions.) Present-— Williams, P. J., Bastow,. Goldman, Halpern and McClusky, JJ. [20 Misc 2d 452.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

t. Order unanimously reversed and proceeding dismissed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Memorandum: Special Term directed the Commissioner of Motor Vehicles to hold a hearing on petitioner’s application for reinstatement of his driver’s license. The court was without power to so direct (Matter of Muscarella v. Macduff, 281 App. Div. 565). The other question presented, that is, whether the Commissioner had authority to deny petitioner the right to reapply before April 1, 1960, we do not reach. Although this appeal has been processed promptly by the parties and by this court, this question has now become academic 'by lapse of time. (Appeal from order of Onondaga Special Term granting petitioner’s application, vacating the denial of his application for driver’s license, and making other directions.) Present-— Williams, P. J., Bastow,. Goldman, Halpern and McClusky, JJ. [20 Misc 2d 452.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 A.D.2d 894, 199 N.Y.S.2d 1008, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10757, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grosso-v-hults-nyappdiv-1960.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack