Grossman v. Weinstein
This text of 256 A.D. 908 (Grossman v. Weinstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order unanimously modified by denying the motion to compel plaintiff separately to state and number causes of action and by denying the motion to strike out paragraphs 18, 21, 22, 23 and 24 of the complaint, and, as so modified, affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant, with leave to the plaintiff to serve an amended complaint within ten days after entry of order. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Cohn, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
256 A.D. 908, 10 N.Y.S.2d 409, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5359, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grossman-v-weinstein-nyappdiv-1939.