Grossman v. United States

246 F.2d 709, 101 U.S. App. D.C. 22
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedJune 13, 1957
DocketNo. 12959
StatusPublished

This text of 246 F.2d 709 (Grossman v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Grossman v. United States, 246 F.2d 709, 101 U.S. App. D.C. 22 (D.C. Cir. 1957).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, as his brief tells us, “prays that this court remand the appellant’s request for compensation, and recognition, to the United States Atomic Energy Commission, as the inventor who first gave the atomic hydrogen bomb formulas to the United States of America.” By our order of February 10, 1956, we remanded the case to the Commission that the petitioner might there seek the administrative relief to which he believes himself entitled. A hearing was accordingly held by the Commission’s Patent Compensation Board where petitioner was afforded an opportunity once again to present his claim in full and to submit his evidence. We are not shown that the Board erred. Its determination that the petitioner has no valid claim under the Atomic Energy Acts1 is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 1811
42 U.S.C. § 1811(e)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
246 F.2d 709, 101 U.S. App. D.C. 22, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grossman-v-united-states-cadc-1957.