Grossman v. United States

Fourth Circuit

Grossman v. United States

16 F.2d 1018, 1927 U.S. App. LEXIS 3697

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 22, 1927

DocketNo. 2552

StatusPublished

This text of 16 F.2d 1018 (Grossman v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grossman v. United States, 16 F.2d 1018, 1927 U.S. App. LEXIS 3697 (4th Cir. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, defendant below, was convicted on all four counts of an information charging sales and possession of intoxicating liquors for beverage purposes. The evidence, if believed, was sufficient to sustain the verdict. The portions of the charge of the learned District Judge here complained of, even when taken from their context, are not open to the construction which the defendant would have us put on them. When read in connection with the rest of what the judge told the jury, they are unexceptionable.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, defendant below, was convicted on all four counts of an information charging sales and possession of intoxicating liquors for beverage purposes. The evidence, if believed, was sufficient to sustain the verdict. The portions of the charge of the learned District Judge here complained of, even when taken from their context, are not open to the construction which the defendant would have us put on them. When read in connection with the rest of what the judge told the jury, they are unexceptionable.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 F.2d 1018, 1927 U.S. App. LEXIS 3697, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grossman-v-united-states-ca4-1927.