Grossman v. Sheridane Designs, Ltd.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Grossman v. Sheridane Designs, Ltd.

54 A.D.2d 685, 387 N.Y.S.2d 547, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14235

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 5, 1976·Published

Opinion

In an action inter alia on a contract, plaintiff appeals from a resettled judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered January 15, 1976, which, after a nonjury trial, dismissed the complaint on the merits. Resettled judgment affirmed, with one bill of costs jointly to respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs. Upon this record, the trial court, sitting as the trier of the facts, could properly determine that the plaintiff had no right to recover. Cohalan, Acting P. J., Margett, Damiani, Shapiro and Titone, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action inter alia on a contract, plaintiff appeals from a resettled judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered January 15, 1976, which, after a nonjury trial, dismissed the complaint on the merits. Resettled judgment affirmed, with one bill of costs jointly to respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs. Upon this record, the trial court, sitting as the trier of the facts, could properly determine that the plaintiff had no right to recover. Cohalan, Acting P. J., Margett, Damiani, Shapiro and Titone, JJ., concur.

Grossman v. Sheridane Designs, Ltd., 54 A.D.2d 685, 387 N.Y.S.2d 547, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14235 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

54 A.D.2d 685 (Grossman v. Sheridane Designs, Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.