Grossman v. Sheridane Designs, Ltd.
This text of 54 A.D.2d 685 (Grossman v. Sheridane Designs, Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action inter alia on a contract, plaintiff appeals from a resettled judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered January 15, 1976, which, after a nonjury trial, dismissed the complaint on the merits. Resettled judgment affirmed, with one bill of costs jointly to respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs. Upon this record, the trial court, sitting as the trier of the facts, could properly determine that the plaintiff had no right to recover. Cohalan, Acting P. J., Margett, Damiani, Shapiro and Titone, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
54 A.D.2d 685, 387 N.Y.S.2d 547, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14235, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grossman-v-sheridane-designs-ltd-nyappdiv-1976.