Grossman v. Sheresky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Grossman v. Sheresky

285 A.D. 935, 139 N.Y.S.2d 888, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6182

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 18, 1955

StatusPublished

This text of 285 A.D. 935 (Grossman v. Sheresky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grossman v. Sheresky, 285 A.D. 935, 139 N.Y.S.2d 888, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6182 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

The record before Special Term did not warrant the granting of the extraordinary remedy of receivership. Order unanimously modified so [936]*936as to eliminate that provision and, as so modified, affirmed. The provision for speedy trial is to be complied with and this court will make any further provision with respect to expediting the joinder of issue and the furnishing of particulars as may be necessary. Accordingly, settle order on notice. Present — Cohn, J. P., Callahan, Breitel, Botein and Rabin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The record before Special Term did not warrant the granting of the extraordinary remedy of receivership. Order unanimously modified so [936]*936as to eliminate that provision and, as so modified, affirmed. The provision for speedy trial is to be complied with and this court will make any further provision with respect to expediting the joinder of issue and the furnishing of particulars as may be necessary. Accordingly, settle order on notice. Present — Cohn, J. P., Callahan, Breitel, Botein and Rabin, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

285 A.D. 935, 139 N.Y.S.2d 888, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grossman-v-sheresky-nyappdiv-1955.