Grossman v. Schindel
274 A.D. 882, 84 N.Y.S.2d 699, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3855
Opinion
Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs to the respondent, with leave to the defendants-appellants to move, within twenty days, at Special Term for reargument upon a showing that they have affirmatively complied with the provisions of the Office of Price Administration regulations with respect to establishing a maximum price as required by the decision in International Spangles Corp. v. Marrow Mfg. Corp. (294 N. Y. 295). No opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Grossman v. Schindel, 274 A.D. 882, 84 N.Y.S.2d 699, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3855 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1948).
274 A.D. 882 (Grossman v. Schindel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
International Spangles Corp. v. Marrow Manufacturing Corp.
62 N.E.2d 77 (New York Court of Appeals, 1945)