Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Grossman v. Schindel

Grossman v. Schindel

274 A.D. 882, 84 N.Y.S.2d 699, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3855
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 18, 1948
StatusPublished

This text of 274 A.D. 882 (Grossman v. Schindel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Grossman v. Schindel, 274 A.D. 882, 84 N.Y.S.2d 699, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3855 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1948).

Opinion

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs to the respondent, with leave to the defendants-appellants to move, within twenty days, at Special Term for reargument upon a showing that they have affirmatively complied with the provisions of the Office of Price Administration regulations with respect to establishing a maximum price as required by the decision in International Spangles Corp. v. Marrow Mfg. Corp. (294 N. Y. 295). No opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

International Spangles Corp. v. Marrow Manufacturing Corp.
62 N.E.2d 77 (New York Court of Appeals, 1945)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
274 A.D. 882, 84 N.Y.S.2d 699, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3855, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grossman-v-schindel-nyappdiv-1948.