Grossman v. Redi-Food Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Grossman v. Redi-Food Co.

2 A.D.2d 670, 152 N.Y.S.2d 624, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4912

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 19, 1956

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 2 A.D.2d 670 (Grossman v. Redi-Food Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grossman v. Redi-Food Co., 2 A.D.2d 670, 152 N.Y.S.2d 624, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4912 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

Order and judgment of the Appellate Term dismissing the complaint unanimously reversed and the verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiff in the City Court reinstated, with costs and disbursements to the appellant. The evidence received on the trial amply demonstrated the apparent authority of Rudolph Wagner, Jr., to make the alleged contract. Since the employment was coupled with an investment in the business, its agreed duration was not unusual. Moreover, the evidence shows that Rudolph Wagner, Jr., was the highest salaried employee, a vice-president, a. stockholder and director in this closely held corporation. On this trial he testified on behalf of defendant that he employed plaintiff as a part of the reorganization of the corporation’s operations. Settle order on notice. Concur—Peck, P. J., Breitel, Botein, Rabin and Cox, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order and judgment of the Appellate Term dismissing the complaint unanimously reversed and the verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiff in the City Court reinstated, with costs and disbursements to the appellant. The evidence received on the trial amply demonstrated the apparent authority of Rudolph Wagner, Jr., to make the alleged contract. Since the employment was coupled with an investment in the business, its agreed duration was not unusual. Moreover, the evidence shows that Rudolph Wagner, Jr., was the highest salaried employee, a vice-president, a. stockholder and director in this closely held corporation. On this trial he testified on behalf of defendant that he employed plaintiff as a part of the reorganization of the corporation’s operations. Settle order on notice. Concur—Peck, P. J., Breitel, Botein, Rabin and Cox, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 A.D.2d 670, 152 N.Y.S.2d 624, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4912, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grossman-v-redi-food-co-nyappdiv-1956.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack