Grossman v. MKF Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Grossman v. MKF Realty Corp.

203 A.D.2d 129, 610 N.Y.S.2d 247

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 19, 1994

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 203 A.D.2d 129 (Grossman v. MKF Realty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grossman v. MKF Realty Corp., 203 A.D.2d 129, 610 N.Y.S.2d 247 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan Lobis, J.), entered January 7, 1993, which, to the extent appealed from, granted defendant’s motion for renewal or reargument and thereupon denied its cross-motion for payment of rent retroactive to April 1, 1980, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

As the IAS Court properly determined (155 Misc 2d 841), the 1992 amendment to the Loft Law (Multiple Dwelling Law § 284 [1] [ii]; L 1992, ch 227, § 1), providing that owners who take certain steps to bring their premises up to residential standards "shall hereafter be deemed in compliance”, creates a new right to collect rents prospectively, and was not intended to confer an entitlement to back rents accruing since April 1, 1980. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Rosenberger, Wallach, Ross and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan Lobis, J.), entered January 7, 1993, which, to the extent appealed from, granted defendant’s motion for renewal or reargument and thereupon denied its cross-motion for payment of rent retroactive to April 1, 1980, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

As the IAS Court properly determined (155 Misc 2d 841), the 1992 amendment to the Loft Law (Multiple Dwelling Law § 284 [1] [ii]; L 1992, ch 227, § 1), providing that owners who take certain steps to bring their premises up to residential standards "shall hereafter be deemed in compliance”, creates a new right to collect rents prospectively, and was not intended to confer an entitlement to back rents accruing since April 1, 1980. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Rosenberger, Wallach, Ross and Rubin, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

203 A.D.2d 129, 610 N.Y.S.2d 247, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grossman-v-mkf-realty-corp-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack